By Rabbi Yair Hoffman for 5tjt.com He was a ninth grade Yeshiva student – a good boy, who learned well. For some reason, however, he kicked the door in the school building – to keep it open, in all probability. Unfortunately, the door broke. It was a glass door, and it spontaneously shattered – completely. The young man felt badly, and informed the Rosh Yeshiva immediately. He took full responsibility. The Rosh Yeshiva responded, “I am very sorry, but this is mammon hekdesh. I cannot just let it go. You must pay for its replacement, and it is several hundred dollars.” The boy took responsibility and for the next 2 years – every penny that he made he brought to the Yeshiva to pay back. He did not tell his parents, so as not to put additional financial pressure on them. His father is a talmid chochom who learns all day and his mother is in chinuch. His parents found out about it two years later, by accident. WHAT IS THE HALACHA? Of course, if this question comes up, one must ask his own Rav or Posaik and not rely on this article, But what is the halacha? Is the Yeshiva in its full rights in demanding full payment from the student? Does the Rosh Yeshiva not have the right to forego the damage? THE GENERAL HALACHA The general halacha found in Shulchan Aruch (Choshain Mishpat 421:3 and Siman 278) is that if someone damages another, even if it is not done on purpose (shogaig) and even if it was not his fault at all (an onais) he is obligated to pay. The Gemorah in Gittin (49a), however, darshens, “shor ray’ay’hu – velo shor shel hekdesh.” The Torah specifically states that damage must be paid when damage is done to the ox of his peer – and not when it is done to an ox that was donated to the Temple. This Gemorah actually states that the one who does such damage is technically exempt. However, the Baalei Tosfos on that Gemorah write that miderabanan, by Rabbinic decree, there is an obligation to pay. There are other Rishonim that have different approaches, but it seems that this is the essential view – lehalacha. DOES THE ROSH YESHIVA NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BE MOCHEL? Before the second World War, Rav Elchonon Wasserman hy”d was visiting America and had made the acqauntance of R’ Shraga Feivel Mendelevitch ob”m. R’ Shraga Feivel had posed to Rav Elchonon a question regarding long hair [bluris] that the bochurim at the time sported. The Mishna Brurah (27:15) seems to be very stringent about the matter. Rav Elchonon Wasserman responded that a Yeshiva must be careful not to turn off the bochurim and advised R’ Shraga Feivel not to make an issue of it. Although this incident is illustrative, it seems that just as a Rosh yeshiva has certain leeway to give gifts from a Yeshiva to donors even though it is mammon hekdesh – by the same token he should be able to have that leeway in whether to force someone to pay for something that happened inadvertently. It would seem that this is the rationale of the Steipler in the following incident. YESHIVA BE’ER YAAKOV INCIDENT Rav Moshe Shmuel Shapiro (1917-2006) zt”l was the […]
The post The Case of the Yeshiva’s Broken Glass Door and the 9th Grader appeared first on The Yeshiva World.
View Source: Read More
Recent Post
Gallery
Featured Videos
